 |  |  |  |
Does Compact Development Increase or Reduce Traffic Congestion?
Principal Investigator:
Reid Ewing, University of Utah
Co-Investigators:
- Shima Hamidi, University of Texas at Arlington
Summary:
It is now widely held, even among many state transportation departments, that you cannot “pave your way out of congestion” (at least in the long run) due to highway induced traffic and highway induced development (sprawl). Therefore, any solution to highway congestion must be multi-faceted and must, in particular, reduce the need for so much vehicular traffic. From years of other research, we know...
It is now widely held, even among many state transportation departments, that you cannot “pave your way out of congestion” (at least in the long run) due to highway induced traffic and highway induced development (sprawl). Therefore, any solution to highway congestion must be multi-faceted and must, in particular, reduce the need for so much vehicular traffic. From years of other research, we know that compact development that is dense, diverse, well-designed, etc. reduces vehicle miles traveled. But compact development also concentrates origins and destinations. No one has yet determined, using credible compactness/sprawl metrics and congestion/travel time data, the net effect of these countervailing forces.
Using compactness/sprawl metrics developed in an earlier project at the University of Utah, and congestion/travel time data from TTI's Urban Mobility Scorecard Annual Report database, this study will determine which point of view is correct. It will do so by (1) measuring compactness, congestion, and other control variables using the best national data available for U.S. urbanized areas and (2) relating these variables to one another using multivariate methods to determine whether compactness is positively or negatively related to congestion and travel times.
This project will be very cost-effective. The compactness/sprawl metrics have already been developed and published by the PI of this project for urbanized areas, metropolitan areas, metropolitan counties, and census tracts. They have already been used by our team to study other costs of sprawl in five peer reviewed articles. Our current sample of FHWA urbanized areas consists of the largest 162 urbanized areas, all with populations over 200,000. Our sample will be expanded to include all urbanized areas with over 100,000 population. Smaller urbanized areas are unlikely to experience major traffic congestion, and will be omitted. Control variables will be estimated using publicly available data sets, principally the American Community Survey and the National Transit Database. Congestion/travel time data are now available, for the first time, for 471 FHWA urbanized areas from INRIX, in association with TTI.
See More
Project Details
| Project Type: | Research |
|---|---|
| Project Status: | Completed |
| End Date: | December 31, 2017 |
| UTC Funding: | $36,416 |
Downloadable Products
- urban sprawl associated with traffic congestion (PRESENTATION)
- Does compact development increase or reduce traffic congestion? (PUBLICATION)
- Does Compact Development Increase or Reduce Traffic Congestion? (FINAL_REPORT)
- Does Compact Development Increase or Reduce Congestion? (PROJECT_BRIEF)