Smart Parking Reduces Congestion, Increases Transit Ridership
In 2011, San Fransisco introduced SFPark, a smart parking program. SFpark uses demand-responsive pricing to open up parking spaces and reduce circling and double-parking. Rates can vary by block, time of day and day of week, and are adjusted at most once per month.
In the latest NITC report, researcher Nicole Ngo of the University of Oregon investigates the effects of the demand-responsive pricing program on transit usage and congestion.
The study focused on metered, on-street parking and used the timing of SFpark's pricing changes as a natural experiment. Researchers observed effects on three important aspects of urban transportation: parking availability, transit bus ridership and congestion.
Results show that SFpark was effective at reducing parking occupancy range; since the program's implementation, more areas met the target occupancy range of 60-80%.
Ngo also found the the program affected transit ridership: an increase in meter rates is associated with a modest increase in ridership, suggesting people are substituting between transit and non-transit travel and that meter rates factor into mode choice.
"There's a lot of survey data suggesting that if you change parking prices, people are more likely to take the bus. In this study we used data on transit bus ridership and parking data to see if people actually behave that way. We're able to see in the data that parking rate changes do seem to influence transit ridership," Ngo said.
Finally, the study found that SFpark reduced congestion, specifically decreasing lane occupancy and increasing vehicle speed.
These results have important implications for transportation policy as cities continue to expand and implement demand-responsive pricing programs globally.
For future research, Ngo recommends including data for other modes.
"It's interesting that we find parking rate increases are associated with increases in transit ridership, but we don't have information on auto uses, so it would be good to complement it with data on Uber, for example—another mode that isn't transit that involves a car," Ngo said.
In future studies, the researchers would also be interested in looking at impacts of SFpark on air quality, active transportation modes and additional measures of congestion.
"We measured congestion using the speed of the bus between bus stops. That's one good data source, but it would be good to measure it at a larger spatial scale," Ngo said.
Ngo will present results in a free NITC webinar September 26. To hear more about the SFpark findings, tune in tomorrow at 10 am, Pacific.
To learn more about our research, sign up for our newsletter.